1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

As a result of the appraisal of the seal of the appraiser C of the trial at the court, it is recognized that the following stamp image of the defendant's name is based on the seal of the defendant, the defendant issued a promissory note with the plaintiff on April 8, 2010 of the issue date, the face value of KRW 17 million, the due date of payment, the due date of payment, the due date of payment, and the due date of payment, and the due date of the appraisal of the appraiser C. In addition to the purport of the entire pleadings, the defendant issued a promissory note with the plaintiff on April 8, 2010 of the statement of No. 1 (the Promissory Notes, the defendant's defense that the document was forged by the plaintiff, but it is not sufficient to accept the statement of Nos. 6 through 8 and the result of the written appraisal of the appraiser C of the trial at the court at the court at the court at the court at the court at the court at the trial at the court at the trial at the court at the Seoul Special Metropolitan City. According to the above recognition facts, the plaintiff at the above 17 million won and the next date of the plaintiff at the next 20.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be accepted on the ground of its reasoning, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just and the defendant's appeal is dismissed on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.