beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On July 26, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1,00,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Jeonju District Court’s Gun mountain support on July 26, 2010, and on March 21, 2014, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 4,00,00 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Jeonju District Court’s Gun mountain support on March 21, 2014, and on August 17, 2017, the Defendant violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act, such as imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Jeonju District Court’s Gun mountain support, which was sentenced
On December 4, 2018, at around 01:30, the Defendant driven a 2 km-free car from the front day of the restaurant in which the trade name in the Seo-gu of Gwangju is unknown while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.170% without a driver’s license.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. E statements;
1. Each photograph (Nos. 5, 7 of the evidence list);
1. The CD;
1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;
1. The register of driver's licenses (the Serial No. 15 of the evidence list);
1. A previous conviction in judgment: An inquiry letter, each summary order, and the application of statutes applicable to such judgment;
1. Relevant Article 152 subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act, Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act, Article 148-2 (1) 1 of the Road Traffic Act, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of running a sound driving);
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;
1. Taking into account all the circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime in the course of the suspension of imprisonment for the same kind of crime, the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime in the course of the suspension of execution of imprisonment for the same kind of crime, the fact that the blood alcohol concentration was high, and the fact that the Defendant recognized