logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2019.03.14 2018가합3600
임대차보증금반환
Text

1. The defendant shall pay 240,000,000 won to the plaintiff.

2. The plaintiff's remaining claims are dismissed.

3. The costs of the lawsuit.

Reasons

1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

2. Articles 257(1) and 208(3)1 of the Civil Procedure Act of the judgment without holding any pleadings.

3. The Plaintiff partially dismissed the Plaintiff claimed damages for delay from the day following the delivery of a copy of the instant complaint to KRW 240,000,000.

However, the lessor’s obligation to return the lease deposit upon the termination of the lease agreement is in the simultaneous performance relationship with the lessee’s obligation to return the leased object. Since the Plaintiff is the Plaintiff who did not return the leased object to the Defendant, it cannot be deemed that the Defendant’s obligation to return the lease deposit was delayed, the part seeking damages for delay is without merit.

arrow