logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.02.03 2016나31280
공사대금
Text

1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: "Additional Tax" in Part 2 of Part 3 of the Judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed as "value-added Tax"; "Corporation" in Part 11 of the same part shall be deemed as "Corporation"; "In Part 4, 6, 7, and 14 of the same part shall be deemed as " August 26, 2013"; "No. 9 of the same part shall be deemed as "No. 11, 2013"; "No. 4, 5" in Part 14, 15 of the same part shall be deemed as "No. 17 days"; and No. 5, No. 17 of the same part shall be deemed as "no. 17"; and "no. 14, 5" shall be deemed as "no. 40" in the corresponding part of the judgment shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 20 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is accepted within the above scope of recognition, and all of the plaintiff's remaining claims of this case and the defendant's counterclaims are dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate with this conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow