logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.01.10 2019나35291
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff, a Japanese woman, and the Defendant, a Korean male, established a ties between Korea and Japan from the time around the summer of 2016.

The Plaintiff and the Defendant had a frequent sexual relationship with a fluor during the foregoing period without a fluor, and even after the fluoral boom became fluor, the sexual relationship came into existence in October 2017 and November 201.

On March 22, 2018, the plaintiff visited the pregnant woman in order of the birthist in Japan, but the plaintiff was currently pregnant through the early wave test, and the number of pregnant women became 18 weeks 3th day of pregnancy.

On the same day, the Plaintiff’s mobile Messen to the Defendant that “I want to come to a friend with an important flusium,” and the Defendant said, “I do not have any problem.” However, the Defendant refused the Plaintiff’s proposal on the ground that the Plaintiff did not have a her fetus.”

Accordingly, the Plaintiff cited the Defendant as follows: “The female body burden is so great that it can be resolved alone, and the burden of marriage does not want at all, and even if it is a hospital cost, it will be borne by a half half. It is clear that she is a son, so that she can do so, but she can be understood that she cannot be believed. If she can not be able to do so on her own, she can also undergo a gene test if she can also undergo a gene test.”

However, the Defendant’s “the date of the sex relationship with the width is the end of October 16, 2017 and November 2017, and, if the number of pregnant workers exceeds 18 weeks, November 13, 2017.” Moreover, the Defendant’s “the date of the sex relationship with the width is the end of November 16, 2017, and the number of pregnant workers reaches the end of November 13, 2017, and there is no spacker and spacks in the beginning of November, 2017.” Moreover, the Defendant’s Mesens off the Mes without recognizing that the sperm is one’s fetus is too low, even

Then, on March 28, 2018, the Plaintiff was in the Messenger.

arrow