beta
Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to pay below shall be revoked.
The defendant.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a domestic marriage broker who has reported under the Act on the Management of Marriage Brokers Business.
B. On January 4, 2015, the Plaintiff drafted a “PURPES membership agreement” with C (Defendant’s friendly mother) as follows.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant contract”). Members A: A (Defendant) A (Plaintiff) Company A (Plaintiff) entered into the following contracts for the purpose of joining B.
1. A shall select and conclude one of Articles 2 and 3, and simultaneously be a member of the Plaintiff, and B shall be a member of the Plaintiff, and B shall provide the opportunity to receive the most adjacent to the abnormal sentence of A through each title system and the optimal information.
3. A shall choose (O) one of the following subparagraphs to pay B membership fees according to the membership grade, and B shall arrange for B to have E as a member grade:
(hereinafter omitted)
C. Eul continued to provide Gap with this gender until sexual intercourse.
Provided, That the period shall be three years from the date of the contract.
4. A shall pay 30 days after the decision of gender divorce in the amount of 10 million won for gender divorce between its members (i.e., one time in South Korea).
sexual intercourse means a case of determining the date of marriage or filing a report of marriage before marriage, which means the case of commencing the living together.
(In this case, the name of member A (Defendant) and the confirmation of terms and conditions of a contract shall be confirmed, unless the expenses for sexual intercourse case are paid to B within 30 days of sexual intercourse: B.
C. In accordance with the instant contract, the Plaintiff arranged to the Defendant with women, and in particular, on February 1, 2015, the Plaintiff arranged to exchange with D, a member of the Plaintiff.
After that, on October 3, 2015, the defendant married with the above D.
[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, entry of Gap's 1 through 3, purport of whole pleading
2. The parties' assertion;
A. The plaintiff's assertion.