logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.07.15 2016노632
사기
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In relation to the facts stated in the judgment of the court below [2015 Highest 936], with regard to the crime of the injured company, the injured company handled not only nitroum powder but also other metal, F received samples from the defendant's management H to verify that there is no nitroum powder and no nitroum powder, and F to purchase the damaged company, and F was present at the work of the injured company in order to send the damaged company to the injured company. The contract between the defendant and the injured company stated that the object of the transaction was nitroum powder, but the contract between the injured company and the injured company stated that the injured company was changed into the object of the transaction by agreement, but the latter stated that the goods of the commercial invoice and packaging specifications are directly decrye, and the F was stated differently as the goods of the commercial invoice and packaging specifications for convenience in customs clearance, and the latter stated that F was the goods of the commercial invoice for convenience in customs clearance.

However, in light of the F’s career, etc., when comprehensively considering the following facts: (a) the Defendant knew that the freight items listed in the commercial invoice, etc. and the actual cargo are not cleared; (b) thus, it cannot be reliable; (c) the F confirmed that the secondary cargo loaded upon the receipt of a bill of lading from the Defendant is the merptor and remitted; (d) The 1km price per kilogram exceeds 99% of the facts charged; and (e) the Defendant was departing from the Republic of Korea for its business within the Thailand, not for the escape after the instant case; and (e) the Defendant did not sell the merptor, and thus, it does not constitute fraud.

In relation to the facts constituting an offense of the lower judgment [2015 High Order 4102], the Defendant had the intent and ability to pay the rent at the time, but was unable to pay the rent at the time, as he was staying in a foreign country for business purposes, and the instant car was lost on October 17, 2013.

B. The sentence of the lower court is unfair (three years of imprisonment);

arrow