Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 15, 2013, at around 03:58, the Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant: (a) obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by force, such as, under the influence of alcohol, having the customer who was on the customer’s face while taking a bath to the customer who was on the customer’s face; and (b) having the customer on the restaurant, such as beer’s disease, beer’s disease, and beer’s contact with a strike, etc. on the customer; and (c) allowing the customer who was on the restaurant to leave the restaurant without calculating the class.

2. 공용물건손상 피고인은 2013. 11. 15. 05:50경 대구 동구 F에 있는 대구동부경찰서에서, 제1항 범죄사실로 현행범인 체포되어 유치장 2호 유치실에 입감되자마자 "내 등산가방이 없어졌다. 직접 찾으러 가야한다. 문 열어라."라고 말하며 발로 유치실 문을 차고, 비눗갑을 유치인 보호관을 향해 집어던지고 주먹으로 때릴 듯이 위협을 하면서 "문을 안 열어주면 문을 다 부순다."라고 소리치며 소란을 피우다가 유치실 내 세면대를 발로 차 부수어 공무소에서 사용하는 물건을 손상하여 그 효용을 해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report on the occurrence of the case, photograph of the crime, and the investigation report on the damage and damage to public property in the detention room (the toilet screen), photograph of the damage, and report on the investigation (the attachment to the detailed repair charge receipt in the detention room);

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with business), Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with business), and the selection of a fine, respectively, for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The Defendant, at the time of committing the crime as indicated in the judgment, was in a state of falling short of the ability to discern things or make decisions.

2. According to the records of this case, the defendant is decided.