1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the judgment of the court of first instance, is that of the court of first instance, except for the modification and addition of the relevant part in the judgment of the court of first instance as set forth below 2, thereby citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of

(E) In light of all the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff and all the circumstances revealed in the record and the trial of this case, it cannot be deemed that there was negligence on the part of the Defendant in the likelihood of and rescue activities for the Deceased’s suicide, and thus, the circumstances where the Plaintiffs caused the death of the Deceased, which is out of the Republic of Korea, due to the suicide of the Deceased, are sufficiently understood, but it is determined that there is no room for the Defendant to bear any legal responsibility regarding the Deceased’s suicide. Rather, the Defendant also seems to have suffered serious mental shock and pain due to the Deceased’s repeated suicide and the Plaintiff’s repeated suicide and the Plaintiff’s complaint. The fact finding and judgment of the first instance court to the same purport is justifiable, and there is no error as alleged in the grounds for appeal by the Plaintiffs. On August 13, 2017, 205, the lower investigation agency based on the following facts: “The Defendants, including the Defendant, raised an additional investigation agency against the Defendant on the charge of suicide, by taking account of the following facts: (a) the Defendant’s charges of suicide again and the Defendant’s second investigation agency.”

Plaintiff

B around May 2014 and around June 2010.