Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a veterinarian who has operated a 'C' veterinary hospital currently operated by the victim B with the victim and has been in dispute with the victim as a matter of settlement according to the same business.

1. Around 14:40 on November 18, 2019, the Defendant interfered with business, at the C veterinary hospital located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D2 floor, the Defendant found that the victim performed an operation, and caused the victim and the victim to have found the equipment, such as an ultra-frequency device, dental softs device, blood analysis device, etc. located in the hospital outside of the hospital. In the operation room, the Defendant took away the collection equipment, such as an ultra-frequencys device, dental softs device, blood analysis device, etc. located in the hospital, and the victim in the operation room, “I will only be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to d

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the business of a veterinary hospital operated by the victim by force for one hour.

2. A thief: (a) using the gap in the date and time stated in paragraph (1); (b) the victim performed a surgery at a place where the victim performed, the Defendant stolen the victim’s articles worth KRW 310,000,00 in total, including one stude with a 200,000,000 market price owned by the victim; (c) one stude with a stude with a 10,000,000 won per market price; and (d) a

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (in cases of submitting a copy of a complaint of a victim and CCTV closure data, etc.);

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order (Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act) [In relation to the thief crime, the defendant and his defense counsel found the victim's custody of the articles listed in Paragraph (2) of the judgment in the judgment (one set-up store, one destroyed spawn, one spawn, and one spawn for a capsule) as the articles owned by the defendant.