logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.08.13 2013구합3063
중소기업창업사업계획승인신청불승인처분취소
Text

1. The Defendant’s disposition to return the application for approval of the small and medium enterprise start-up business plan to the Plaintiff on September 2, 2013 is revoked.

2...

Reasons

Details of the disposition

A. On November 23, 2012, the Plaintiff, a corporation engaged in the foster aggregate extraction business, filed an application for approval of a small and medium enterprise start-up business plan (hereinafter “instant business plan”) with the Defendant for new construction of a factory for manufacturing non-metallic mineral crushing products (hereinafter “instant factory”) on the 18 parcel, such as 4-1, Dong-ri (hereinafter “instant application site”).

B. After completing consultations with the relevant departments, the Defendant referred the said agenda to the deliberation of the Urban Planning Committee in astronomical City. On September 5, 2013, the Defendant rejected the said agenda due to the following reasons as a result of deliberation, and on September 12, 2013, the Defendant rejected the said application for approval on the ground that the said rejection was rejected.

(hereinafter referred to as the "disposition of this case"). - This area is judged to have a substantial impact on the surrounding environment, such as noise, vibration, dust, waste water, etc. caused by factory sites - civil petitions seeking the resolution of noise, vibration, dust, waste water, etc. caused by factory sites - a written opinion on factory opposition is adopted by the National Assembly (Industrial Construction Committee). The circumstances of the factory site are inappropriate because there is no dispute. 【No ground for recognition', the statements in Gap's 1 through 3, 6, 7, 9, and Eul's 8 through 11 (including separate numbers), and even if the factory of this case is completed and operated in accordance with the business plan of this case asserted by the plaintiff as to the legitimacy of the disposition of this case as a whole, the wastewater used by the plaintiff is operated without recycling and preventing dust dust by operating damp processes, and it is merely a plan to prevent noise and vibration generated by installing facilities for reduction of carbon support facilities and dust facilities, and it is merely a ground for the residents' noise level or noise, which is likely to affect the environmental damage.

arrow