logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.08.28 2018나71666
손해배상등
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following order for payment shall be revoked, and that part shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant operated a store in the C market located in the Incheon metropolitan area (hereinafter “instant store”).

B. On October 2, 2015, while examining agricultural products sold by the Defendant at the instant store on October 2, 2015, the Plaintiff suffered bodily injury, such as thale, which requires two weeks’ medical treatment, as the wind was very strong.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). C.

On the other hand, with respect to the instant accident, the Defendant was guilty of having inflicted an injury on the Plaintiff by negligence in violation of the duty to take safety measures against the facilities such as the sorarain, etc. at the time (the Defendant was punished by a fine of KRW 700,000 for a fine of KRW 70,000 on suspicion of having inflicted an injury on the Plaintiff by negligence (the Incheon District Court

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap 1 through 11, Eul 1 through 3, the witness D of this court, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. At the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff asserted that the hacker’s hacks part of the instant store, which was in the instant store, suffered serious injury, such as brain, and paid medical expenses of KRW 5,836,254 to the wind of receiving hospitalized treatment, etc. as a result, and did not receive income for 18 days for which the instant hospital was hospitalized, and suffered considerable mental damage.

Therefore, the Defendant is liable for compensating the Plaintiff for damages totaling KRW 9,018,386 [the above medical treatment costs = KRW 5,836,254 in daily income of KRW 1,182,132 in total [the period of hospitalization x KRW 18 days in daily wages of KRW 65,674 in June 201)].

3. Determination

A. As seen earlier, as seen earlier, the instant accident occurred in the course of the instant store, which was occupied and used in the instant store, and shocked the Plaintiff, and the Defendant neglected his/her duty of care, such as the management of the said Pakistan at the time, etc., thereby incurring damages incurred by the Plaintiff due to the instant accident.

arrow