1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 4,390,920 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its payment from July 15, 2017 to the day of full payment.

1. The plaintiff is a management body established automatically pursuant to the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings with all sectional owners of "A" in Seo-gu, Busan as part of all sectional owners of "A," and the defendant is an owner of D, E, F, G, and H among the above aggregate buildings, and there is no dispute between the parties.

2. Determination on the main claim

A. The Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the elevator maintenance expenses (Gho Lake) for the period of 4,737 security guards’ benefits (Gho Lake) 22,600 for the period of 4,515,00 elevator maintenance management expenses (Gho Lake) for the period of 9,474 (Gho Lake) 45,200 elevator maintenance expenses (E) 3,514,514 17,438 elevator maintenance expenses (E), 8,2517 for the period of 17,438 205 6,2015 8,2517 239,368 39,368 2,750 2,750 14,275 14, 205 29, 363 (Ghoho Lake), 205 3,205 3,205 3,205 3,205 3,296

The defendant asserts that in the case of elevator maintenance expenses, the plaintiff should claim against the non-party revenueer, but since the part claimed by the plaintiff to the defendant is about the remaining part of the tenant's payment, that is, the specific heading room, and thus, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

B. According to each description of Gap evidence Nos. 2, 3, and 9 (including a serial number) as to the claim for long-term repair appropriations, the defendant is based on the ratio of 1,176 won per two months for exclusive use imposed according to the plaintiff's management rules.