1. The Plaintiff:

A. The defendant Hosan Co., Ltd., A, B, and G are jointly and severally 2,30,633,606 won and their importance.

1. The following facts are acknowledged based on the following facts: (a) between the Plaintiff and Defendant Red Products Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Tcheon Red Products”), F, and I, pursuant to Article 150(3) and Article 150(1) of the Civil Procedure Act, the Defendants were led to confession; and (b) between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, Defendant A, C, D, E, limited liability companies (hereinafter referred to as “G”), and H, the entire purport of the pleadings is considered to have been taken into account in accordance with the overall purport of the pleadings.

A. 1) The Plaintiff, including the conclusion of a credit guarantee agreement, received a loan from the financial institution by Defendant Hong Hongsan, and received the loan from the financial institution, and the Plaintiff is a Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Supportive Korea”).

(A) On January 2, 2013, a credit guarantee agreement was concluded with each of the following credit guarantee agreements with the above Defendant, with a credit guarantee amount of KRW 1.71 billion, the Bank of Korea of a loan, the Industrial Bank of Korea of a loan, and a credit guarantee agreement with a guarantee number J during the period from January 2, 2013 to May 27, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as “credit guarantee agreement”) and then issued a credit guarantee agreement with a credit guarantee amount of KRW 450,00,000,000,000 with a credit guarantee amount of KRW 45,50,000,000,000, loan bank, foreign exchange bank, and credit guarantee period from January 2, 2013 to December 31, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as “credit guarantee agreement”).

(C) On March 5, 2012, the credit guarantee amount of KRW 1,080,000,000 for credit guarantee amount of KRW 1,080,000,000 for the creditor of the goods price, and the credit guarantee letter of credit guarantee number L from March 5, 2012 to March 4, 2013 (hereinafter “third credit guarantee”) was issued after the conclusion of a credit guarantee agreement between March 5, 2012 to March 4, 2013 (hereinafter “third credit guarantee agreement”), Defendant Mancheon Pusan concluded each of the above credit guarantee agreements, and if Defendant Mancheon Pusan on behalf of the Plaintiff because it was impossible for the Plaintiff to repay each of the above loans or the goods price, it was paid to the Plaintiff in order to compensate for the damages incurred by subrogation and the rate as determined by the Plaintiff (in