1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for partial dismissal as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, this is acceptable as it is by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. On the 6th 13th 14th 6th 14th 14th 6th 6th 14th 14th 6th 14th 14th 14th 16th 16th 16th 16th 18th 16th 16th 202

6th 18th 18th 6th 6th 10 of the judgment of the first instance, “facts,” “(after that, the Defendant filed a second complaint against the Plaintiff as defamation, but was dismissed by the Incheon District Prosecutors’ Office on November 26, 2019).”

From the 7th judgment of the first instance court, the first instance court held that the first instance court’s 1th to 13th evidence “B” was insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff was engaged in non-Subrogation activities with the intent to obstruct the Defendant’s business, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge the Defendant’s allegation.

The 7th of the judgment of the first instance court, "A evidence Nos. 4 through 6" of the 15th of the judgment, shall be deemed "B evidence Nos. 4 through 6, 15 through 17".

8 pages 13 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be from 8 to 14 of the evidence No. 8.

Each statement of evidence Nos. 8, 13, and 14 alone is insufficient to acknowledge that the Plaintiff unlawfully transferred the expenses for holding the first general meeting of dismissal to the Defendant, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge the Defendant’s assertion (In accordance with the statement of evidence No. 24, the Defendant and the head of the Defendant’s association, the head of the association, and the Plaintiff, F, and C, etc., filed a lawsuit seeking damages on the ground that the Defendant would incur damages to the Plaintiff, F, and others by committing any tort that obstructs the progress of the first general meeting of dismissal on June 10, 2017, by holding the first general meeting of dismissal in violation of Article 18(1) of the Articles of association, and by committing any tort that prevents the Plaintiff, F, and C from holding the first general meeting of dismissal on the ground that they would incur damages to the Defendant’s expenditure of the expenses for holding the first general meeting of dismissal and the expenses for holding the special meeting of September 23, 2017