Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of two million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants jointly and severally, around 20:30 on July 14, 2018, on the ground that the victim E (the age of 46) (the victim) who was a dormitory scam in the dormitory of D Company E (the age of 46) had been engaged in talking with D Company on the ground that they were cambling with D Company E (the age of 46) and cambling, and the Defendant B had made a dispute, and Defendant B attached both arms of the victim after the victim. Defendant A had the victim's face and cambling, and Defendant A had the victim suffered injury, such as the full escape of about 4 weeks, Ma14, 15, 16 A, and open cambling, which require approximately 4 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the Defendants’ statements in this Court (each statement to the effect that the Defendants got victims E drinking at the time and on the date and time stated in the judgment of the Defendants A, and Defendant B put them into the above two arms in the process)

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect regarding E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to death diagnosis reports and investigation reports (suspect A death diagnosis reports and written agreements);

1. Relevant Article 2 (2) 3 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 2 (2) 1 of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the Defendants and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. At the time and place in the decision of the summary of the argument, the defendant A attempted to take the defendant as a simplified fire extinguishing machine, which is a dangerous object of E, from which the defendant B followed the above two arms of E, and the defendant A defended against the act of unfair attack, since he prices the face of E at the first place, and the defendant A defended against the act of unfair attack.

2. According to the evidence revealed above, the defendants put the two arms of the victim following the victim as the victim E suffered vision due to the reason that the victim E would be able to get dysa and fry, and the defendant B put the two arms.