logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.07.20 2017고단1363
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From March 2016, the Defendant is a business owner operating sexual traffic establishments with the trade name “D” from March 2, 2016 to Yangsan-si C and 2, and E is a person who jointly operates the Defendant and the above-mentioned business, and engages in similar acts with male customers.

Around December 28, 2016, Defendant 1 was equipped with business facilities for sexual traffic, such as simple beds, and arranged to receive KRW 70,000 as a picture from male customers visiting the said D around 19:50 on December 28, 2016, and arrange E to engage in the act of similaritying the sexual organ of the said customer by hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. A written statement;

1. Reporting on the arrest of the case;

1. Sound recording files CDs at the time of crackdown;

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, etc. of Arranging Sexual Traffic for the crime in question, the reason for imposing the sentence of imprisonment [the scope of the recommended sentence] 19 years of age or older, and the basic area (from June to one year and four months) (no person subject to special sentencing] in the basic area (from June to one year), such as brokerage of commercial sex acts, etc. (the brokerage of commercial sex acts by giving and receiving fees), is relatively small, and it is reasonable to consider that the type of the business in question of this case is relatively small, and that the brokerage of commercial sex acts does not occur directly.

However, even though the Defendant did not have any attitude to reflect on the crime despite objective evidence such as a recording file in which the conversation with the police officer at the time was recorded, according to the circumstances and circumstances of the above sexual traffic arrangement, and the contents of the conversation, it appears that the above establishment continued to engage in sexual traffic arrangement at the above establishment. In particular, even if the Defendant had been punished for the same kind of crime before the instant case, it is inevitable to punish the corresponding crime in that it committed the instant crime.

arrow