logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2014.01.17 2013고단646
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months and by a fine of 500,000 won.

The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2013 Highest 646"

1. The Defendant did not confirm the actual goods on the Internet website “Sena” and used the fact that the goods can be traded in the way of receiving money from the goods first by receiving the money from the Internet site, thereby using the fact that the Defendant sells the goods that the Defendant did not have, in turn, received money from the Defendant.

On March 28, 2013, at the defendant's house located in Yeongi-gu K and 105 Dong 801 (L Apartment apartment), the defendant used the computer to access the above Jung-gu K and 105 Dong 801 (L apartment), and discovered that the victim M will purchase the right to use the right to use the right to use the right to use the right to use the right to use the right to use the right to use the right to use the right to use the right to use the right to use the right to use the right to use the right to use the right to use the right to use the right to use the right to use the right to use the right to use the right to use the right to use the

However, the fact is that the defendant did not have the right to purchase the North Korea, and it was thought that he would use the North Korea for the living expenses of the defendant by receiving goods from the victim, so even if he received the price from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the North Korea

The defendant received 720,000 won from the above victim's bank account (Account Number N) in the name of the defendant for the same day.

In addition, from around that time to July 7, 2013, the Defendant received a total of KRW 17,879,000 by the same method over 30 times, as shown in the attached list of crimes.

Accordingly, the defendant was provided property by deceiving the victims.

"2013 Highest 846"

2. The Defendant, on the Internet website NAVER’s website, did not confirm the actual goods and could trade goods by means of receiving the goods first in advance, with the intention of using the fact that the Defendant may sell the goods without the Defendant’s possession by receiving the money of the goods. Along with the foregoing, the Defendant was willing to use the goods by receiving the remittance.

The defendant shall commit a crime against the victimO.

arrow