1. The decision of the court of first instance, including the plaintiff's claim expanded by this court, is as follows.

The plaintiff, on May 19, 2010, lent a total of KRW 70,000,000 to the defendant on May 19, 2010, and KRW 40,000,000 on May 26, 201.

(hereinafter referred to as “1 loans.” The Plaintiff lent to the Defendant the amount indicated in the “date of loan” column in the List of Second Loans (hereinafter referred to as “the date of loan”) and the “amount of loan” column.

(hereinafter referred to as "the second loan list" refers to loans listed in the "the second loan list" collectively, and in the case where it refers to individual loans, it shall be the sequences in the table of the second loan list.

On February 18, 201, 201, 200, 007 7.7 on March 8, 201, 201 8, 00, 000, 000 8.2,000, 000 on April 1, 201, 200, 000 10,000 10, 000 8. 0. 0,000 8, 10,000 11, 200 0. 0, 208 10, 10,000 10, 10, 200, 000 13, 2014 on April 26, 201, 208 0. 10, 205 0,000 . 10,000 7,000 18,015, 2010

However, it is not sufficient to recognize that the statement in Gap evidence 13-2 alone was an agreement that the defendant shall pay 50,000,000 won to the plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim for this part cannot be accepted.

The judgment on the first loan claim is recognized prior to the fact that the plaintiff lent the Defendant a total of KRW 70,000,000 on May 19, 2010 and KRW 40,000,000 on May 26, 201.