(영문) 대구지방법원 상주지원 2014.06.17 2014고단77

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 상주지원 2014.06.17 2014고단77

절도등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 13, 2013, from around 17:30 to 18:10 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the business affairs of the victim E by force, such as: (a) entering the victim E’s general affairs department of the D2 floor located in C and working at the office of the general affairs department of the D2 floor in the city of residence from around 17:30 on February 13, 2013; (b) “The head of the Gu shall not be subject to the calculation of tax revenue and expenditure in rice; (c) the head of the Gu shall not be subject to the calculation of tax revenue and expenditure in rice; and (d)

2. The Defendant: (a) at the time and place of Paragraph (1) of this Article, the above E was prevented from removing the Defendant; (b) the fire extinguishers amounting to approximately KRW 16,000 of the market price managed by the above E was cut away from the stairs; and (c) the case amounting to approximately KRW 18,000 of the market price in the above office was laid down on the floor and damaged.

3. On May 24, 2013, the Defendant: (a) cut off a portable shopping bag equivalent to KRW 2,000, a portable shopping bag owned by the victim G at the F branch office located in C at the time of stay at around 14:38, 2013.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and G;

1. Written estimate and receipt;

1. Eight copies of the photograph;

1. Application of six copies of photograph (No. 17 pages of investigation records), Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment against the crime, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for the suspended sentence of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [decision on the suspended sentence] The reason for the sentencing of the thief under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (decision on the suspended sentence] There is no general thief [decision on the recommended area] basic area of the thief [decision on the scope of punishment for recommendations and handling multiple crimes] / [decision on the suspended sentence] six to one year / six months / [decision on the suspended sentence] principal reason for the thief] not restitution of damage (decision on the suspended sentence] there is no history of exceeding a fine for the last six years against the defendant, and the amount of

참조조문

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원 2014.09.23 2014고단1515

-대전지방법원 2014.08.14 2014고단1712

-광주지방법원 2018.05.17 2018고정142

-청주지방법원 2021.01.21 2020고단1938

-부산지방법원 2019.12.04 2019고단5202