beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
Reasons
The grounds alleged by the plaintiff in the trial while filing an appeal by the court of first instance are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the plaintiff in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance dismissing the plaintiff's claim even if the evidence submitted by the court of first instance is re-examined together with the allegations by
The reasoning for this case is that the court below's reasoning is difficult to conclude that the part 7th through 19 of the judgment of the court of first instance " also driven a package in which most part of the city bus drivers work in accordance with a certain route, and even if there are cases where the plaintiff's work in the state where the voltage is installed, there is a little burden on the trend of light due to vibration or intermittent protruding or sudden stop, etc. exposed to operation, it is difficult to conclude that such a burden was caused by a frequency or robbery as much as inducing the escape certificate of light signboards among the wound of this case or causing a rapid aggravation of nature beyond the natural progress. Furthermore, it is difficult to conclude that the defendant's attitude going outside the future in order to take off the driver stand as alleged by the plaintiff, by itself, caused an injury or injury to the part above above of the court of first instance. In light of such overall circumstances, it is difficult to conclude that the above opinion of the defendant's advice alone alone with the above opinion of the defendant alone makes it difficult to see Article 80 (2) of the Civil Procedure Act."
Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.
Even if the reference documents and briefs submitted by the plaintiff after the closing of argument and the data attached thereto are examined, it is difficult to reverse such judgment, and the plaintiff's application for resumption of argument is also based on them.