logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2007. 03. 16. 선고 2007두7185 판결
원고의 부친이 증여세를 대납하였는지 여부[국패]
Title

Whether the Plaintiff paid gift tax on behalf of the Plaintiff

Summary

The plaintiff is deemed to have repaid to the plaintiff that it was paid by the tenant of real estate, and the gift tax paid by the plaintiff is not a donation from the referring, and it is illegal to impose the gift tax.

Related statutes

Article 2 of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the appellant's grounds of appeal fall under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow