1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is to read “from December 27, 2012 to December 12, 2012” as “from December 17, 2012 to the left-hand RoI image implemented on December 17, 2012, protruding signboards No. 3-4 are not high compared to the flag base base, and may be judged as protruding based on subjective judgment. According to the right-hand RoI image, it is reasonable to see that protruding signboards No. 3-4 are considerably small compared to the flag base base base, so it is reasonable to see it as explosive in the end.”

In addition to adding the contents of Paragraph (2) below, the first instance judgment is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. After the judgment of the court of first instance was rendered, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant claiming that the instant injury or disease was caused by his/her physical burden. On June 23, 2017, the Defendant rendered a decision not to grant medical care benefits on the ground that there was no proximate causal relation between the Plaintiff’s work, 3-4, and galleap, and on June 27, 2017, the Plaintiff appealed against the Defendant on June 27, 2017, and filed a lawsuit seeking revocation of the disposition not to grant medical care benefits as the Jeonju District Court 2017Gudan510.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.