A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, who operates an excessive work in the D market located in Ansan-si, with the trade name of “E”, was a person who operates an excessive work in the D market located in Ansan-si, and caused the party to pay the immediately after being supplied with the first task to trust the credit of the Defendant by paying in cash and allowing the other party to trust the credit of the Defendant at around the time of the supply of the first task, and did not pay a large quantity of excess work on credit.

On December 2, 2014, the Defendant posted a telephone to the victim F, and demanded the victim F to supply an article to the individual council, other than the wholesale market, that the victim does not supply a day to the individual council. The Defendant sent a good good at the Dong, good. B, and sent a good good. B, around December 6, 2014, around the same month, around the 9th day of the same month, and around the 13th day of the same month, the victim received a lock from the victim and paid a premium within each day so that the victim trusted the Defendant, and then, the victim demanded the victim to supply the secret with credit by means of false statement to the effect that “if the day is sent, he/she will pay the credit value after selling it.”

However, at the time of fact, the Defendant was in a state of application for the National Dental Fund as a bad credit holder, and the Defendant was unable to pay a monthly rent in excess of the Defendant’s operation, and all deposits were deducted, and even before, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the amount even if he was sentenced to a fine several times due to a credit transaction and a failure to pay the amount of the excess, and was not paid the amount of the fine even if he was paid the excess from the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as above, accused by deceiving the victim and deceiving him, was 215 boxes of smuggling around December 23, 2014 from the victim.

C. Around 29: (a) received each payment of the 420 boxes, and 275 boxes, around January 14, 2015, and received each payment of the 11,235,000 won at the market price.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1..