A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

[Judgment of the court below]

1. Around October 25, 2012, the Defendant ordered the two-way share with the two-way share at the E-place operated by the victim D located in Yong-Gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Seoul, and the two-way share.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any money at all at the time and did not have any means to pay money instead of the drinking value, so there was no intention or ability to pay money even if the Defendant orders an alcoholic beverage and a share.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victims as above, and received an alcoholic beverage of KRW 1.50,00 from the victims; and (b) deceiving the victims on a total of eight occasions from January 23, 2013 as indicated in the annexed crime list; and (c) obtained property or pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 439,800 from the victims.

2. On January 22, 2013, the Defendant: (a) released Yannam-gun from Yanannam-gun on the 14:20th day of January 22, 2013; (b) laid off brooms around the surrounding area without any reason under the influence of alcohol; (c) laid off brooms, which were the victim F, who is the victim F, the village head, and destroyed the glass of the community hall corresponding to KRW 70,00,0

[Judgment of the court below]

3. Around 09:20 on December 30, 2012, the Defendant: (a) called “I taxi operated by the victim H in front of the G Hospital” and said, “The Defendant was the victim at the time when I taxi was released from the Gunan Eup that reduces KRW 100,000.”

However, the defendant did not have money in the number of times, and there was no certain income, so there was no intention or ability to pay the above taxi rate of KRW 100,000.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received a taxi operation service from the victim up to the roads in front of the Jeon-nam-gun Jamamams, and did not pay KRW 100,000,000 to the taxi charges, thereby obtaining property benefits equivalent to the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

[Each fact in paragraphs 1 and 2 at the market] (The District Public Prosecutor's Office of Gwangju District Public Prosecutor's Office 2013 type 2009).