logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.04.05 2014고단1699
도로교통법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On September 4, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of road traffic law (unlicensed driving) in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 12, 2014.

[Criminal facts] The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Hegel to be a driver of Hegel.

1. On July 4, 2009, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act: (a) around 18:30, the Defendant driven the Hegel to drive the Hegel, which led to two lanes in front of the Glurg Police Station located in the name of the Glurg-gun, Glurg-gun.

In this case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to properly see the front side and the left side and the left side, and to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering and brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to see the floor away from the floor, and neglected to do so on the front side, and received the front side of the EKaren car owned by the victim D who was stopped for the signal waiting in the front side as the front side of the above Hegel who was driving by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant damaged the above car rental car to the extent that the repair cost of KRW 3,364,00,00, such as the back door exchange, etc. due to the above occupational negligence.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Unlicensed Driving) Defendant 1 driven the said Hegel vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license in approximately 15km section from the front of the house of G located in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the G in the border in the above paragraph.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. On-site photographs and photographs of damaged vehicles;

1. Written estimate;

1. Previous convictions in the judgment: Inquiry about criminal history, text of the judgment (the High Court Order 2013Ma1569, the High Court Order 2013Ma1569), and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the revocation of suspended execution (the early 5,01

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow