logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.05.31 2017가합553548
추심금
Text

1. Defendant E shall deliver to Defendant D the real estate listed in the separate sheet.

2. Defendant D shall be attached to Defendant E.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On October 21, 2009, Defendant E entered into a contract to establish a chonsegwon (hereinafter “instant chonsegwon”) with Defendant D, the owner of the real estate listed in the [Attachment List (hereinafter “instant real estate”) as of October 21, 200, and as of November 19, 201 (hereinafter “instant chonsegwon”). On the same day, Defendant E entered into a contract to establish a chonsegwon (hereinafter “instant chonsegwon”) with Defendant D, the owner of the instant real estate as indicated in the [Attachment List”), and completed the registration of the instant chonsegwon as of November 19, 201.

(A) No. 2-3). (b)

In a lawsuit claiming the return of the down payment, etc. filed by the Plaintiffs against Defendant E, the appellate court (Seoul High Court 2015Na2075382), on December 8, 2016, “Defendant E issued a provisional execution sentence ordering Plaintiff E to pay each of the above amount of KRW 250,000,000, KRW 500,000 to Plaintiff B and C, and the damages for delay against each of the above money,” and the above judgment became final and conclusive on April 27, 2017 (Evidence 1-3) (Evidence 1-3), based on the original copy of the judgment of the appellate court, the Plaintiffs received the attachment and seizure of the right to lease on a deposit basis with Seoul Central District Court 2017Da103644, KRW 200, KRW 500, KRW 500, KRW 500, KRW 200, KRW 369757, KRW 29757, KRW 2797,5796,57967,”.275, etc.

(A) No. 2-1, 2). (c)

The Plaintiffs informed Defendant D of the extinguishment of the right to lease on a deposit basis (hereinafter “the right to lease on a deposit basis”) pursuant to Article 313 of the Civil Act on behalf of Defendant E by serving the written complaint of this case on behalf of Defendant E, and reached Defendant D on August 30, 2017.

【Ground for Recognition 【Plaintiffs and Defendant D: The absence of dispute, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including each number), the obvious facts in this court, and the entire pleadings.

arrow