The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant, who is the husband of the victim, enters the victim's house according to E with the permission of E, which is the husband of the victim.

The statements of victims and E are inconsistent and contradictory to each other so that they are not reliable.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below on the grounds for appeal, namely, E, the entry of the Defendant in the court of the court below

Although the victim made a statement to the effect that he/she entered his/her residence, he/she stated that he/she was "at the time he/she entered his/her residence," and the victim stated in the court of the court below that "the defendant was unable to enter this case by entering the court of the court of the court below," and that "the defendant was at the victim's residence to resisting that he/she was attending the court of the court of the court below, and that he/she knew that his/her relationship with the ordinary defendant and the victim was not good

E is recognized in light of the fact that the defendant has entered the victim's residence without permission of E or the victim, considering that there is no reason to permit the defendant to enter the victim's residence, and that the defendant has credibility in the statement of E and the victim's above.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is just, and there is no error of law as alleged by the defendant.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no ground for appeal by the defendant. It is so decided as per Disposition.