logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 2016.12.14 2016누21923
산재보험 사업종류변경신청 반려처분 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court accepted the judgment of the court of first instance are the same as the reasons stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[As stated in its reasoning, the first instance court rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion that the type of business at the Plaintiff’s workplace that mainly produces metal pipe products, which are processed steel pipe products used as oil pipes of ship engines, should be classified as “other metal product manufacturing business or metal processing business (21816)” under the industrial accident insurance premium rates and project classification table for each type of business in 2014, rather than “all kinds of machinery or accessory products manufacturing business (22312). The Plaintiff basically repeats the same assertion in the first instance trial. In light of the allegations and reasons that the Plaintiff partly supplemented in the first instance trial, taking into account the Plaintiff’s assertion and reasons, it is difficult to view the Plaintiff’s assertion that the type of business at the Plaintiff’s workplace falls under the same type of business or manufacturing business as the Plaintiff’s main type of business after examining the respective descriptions stated in the evidence No. 11, 12, A13 through 19, A20-1, A21-2, and A22.

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow