logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
대전지방법원서산지원 2016.06.24 2016가단2712
수목수거 및 토지인도
Text

1. The defendant,

A. The plaintiff A shall collect the surface trees on each land listed in the separate sheet Nos. 4 and 5, and the above.

Reasons

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the following facts are as follows: ① On February 17, 2009, between the defendant and the defendant on February 17, 2009, each land listed in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the attached Table No. 4, and each land listed in paragraphs 1 through 3 of the attached Table No. 1,30,000 and the timing for payment of rent each year

2. From February 17, 2009 to February 28, 2016, a lease agreement was concluded between February 17, 2009 and the end of February 28, 2016, with the purport that the Defendant will return each of the above land to its original condition upon termination of the lease. The fact that the Defendant occupied and used each of the above land by planting trees on each of the above land from around that time; (2) the fact that the Defendant occupied and used each of the above land by planting trees; and (3) the fact that C, the representative of the Plaintiffs, around February 16, 2016, sent to the Defendant a proof that the said lease agreement was terminated on the grounds that it was unpaid for rent in 2014 and 2015

According to the above facts, since the above lease contract was lawfully terminated around February 16, 2016, the defendant is obligated to collect the above land trees from the plaintiff A as stated in attached Tables 4 and 5, deliver each land to the plaintiff. ② collect the above land trees from the plaintiff B and deliver each land to the plaintiff. ③ Of the total rent of KRW 2,600,000 and the total rent of KRW 1,300,000 as of February 28, 2014 and the total rent of KRW 1,30,000 as of February 28, 2014, the date of payment for which the plaintiffs seek after February 17, 2015, KRW 1,300,000 as to the rent of KRW 1,50 as of February 28, 2015, KRW 1,300,000 as of February 28, 2015 and KRW 4,165,000,000 as of the annual rent of this case.

Therefore, the plaintiffs' claim of this case shall be accepted on the grounds of its reasoning, and it is so decided as per Disposition.