beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment of six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three thousand won,00,000 won.
Defendant
B The above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On October 23, 2018, Defendant A was indicted of violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) at the Changwon District Court’s Division, and the Road Traffic Act violation (driving) and tried to obtain a verdict of innocence in order to obtain a verdict of innocence, Defendant A tried to drink at C’s house immediately after the occurrence of the foregoing traffic accident. However, Defendant C and D, at the time of the occurrence of the traffic accident, were unable to see a site for drinking after the occurrence of the traffic accident, Defendant B, who was another one of the other behaviors, had the Defendant give a false testimony that the Defendant would drink her drinking at C’s house after the occurrence of the traffic accident.
Accordingly, on June 15, 2019, the Defendant told B of the trade influence in the E market located in the E market at the same time, “I must make B with the drinking sign when a traffic accident occurred. I must say that C and D drink drink after the occurrence of a traffic accident: “I must have considered C and D drink to drink at the house;” and on June 15, 2019, the Defendant told B again with the cellular phone, as above, for perjury.
On June 17, 2019, B testified to the effect that “A, after the occurrence of a traffic accident, had been present and taken an oath as a witness of the case, such as violation of the Road Traffic Act ( sound driving) against Defendant A in the above court case No. 2019 high-level 5 case, I testified to the effect that “A, after the occurrence of a traffic accident, had been present at the house of C and D heading outside of the house.”
However, in fact, since the above B came out of C and D that the defendant came to enter C's house, there was no witness in C's house where the defendant moves out of C's house.
Accordingly, the Defendant assisted B to make a false statement contrary to memory as above, thereby instigating B with perjury.
2. Defendant B’s Defendant A in the Changwon District Court No. 207 of the Changwon Branch Branch Court at the 67 Yannam-si, Yong-do, the 15:00 on June 17, 2019, in the court of law No. 207, the above court of law No. 2019 High Court Case No. 5, the Road Traffic Act against Defendant A.