1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 9,00,000 to Plaintiff A, KRW 225,00 to Plaintiff B, and KRW 7,080,283 to Plaintiff C, respectively.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. Plaintiff A is a Fborn, and Plaintiff B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A, and “G” is an insurance company that has dispatched a mother manager to home to perform duties, such as support for postnatal care and care for newborn babies, which require postnatal care at home after childbirth, and Defendant D is a mother manager dispatched to the Plaintiff’s house under the above company’s jurisdiction. Defendant E Co., Ltd (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) is a professional professional between the above company and the above company, and is a professional insurance company that has concluded a contract for professional liability to compensate for legal liability for damages caused by others during the period of insurance by causing physical harm or property damage to others while performing their duties (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”).
B. On September 6, 2018, at around 09:25, Defendant D entered the front path of the “Ith Youth with the Plaintiff,” Plaintiff A, who was born one month after the birth of the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff A, who moved from the taxi to the said member, was suffering from an obstacle in India, and the two parts and the inner part of the Plaintiff A, and the inner part of the said part, faced with the concrete floor, and caused the Plaintiff to suffer from the shock of the closed eye and the structural part, etc.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.
Defendant D was guilty of causing injury by occupational negligence (a fine of three million won) through the Suwon District Prosecutors' Office in Sung-nam Branch.
[Grounds for recognition] The descriptions and images of Gap evidence 1 through 5, 9, 11, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination on the cause of the claim
A. According to the above facts finding that the accident in this case occurred due to negligence that was caused by Defendant D’s movement while entering the Plaintiff’s inside and leaving the Plaintiff, and thus, Defendant D is an illegal person under Article 750 of the Civil Act, and the Defendant Company is the insurer of the insurance contract in this case, as the insurer of the insurance contract in this case.