logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
수원지방법원 안양지원 2014.09.05 2014고단625
협박등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 21, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 8 months and two years of suspended execution due to damage to public goods in the Suwon District Court’s Ansan Branch on August 21, 2014, and the said judgment was finalized on September 4, 2014.

1. At around 03:43 on February 10, 2014, the Defendant: (a) expressed that, “Dju store located on the first floor of the building located underground of the Manan-gu Manan-gu Office C” means that, on the ground that the victim E (at least 26 years of age) who is an employee would drink the remaining drinking time, the Defendant expressed that, “I will ignore the victim E (at least 16 years of age), I will b, b, b, b, b, c, and f, b, c, c, and c, f, f, c, c, and f, f, f, f, of the Defendant’s 112 report, f, an employee of the D main store, went home and f, and all police officers returned to the “D main store”, but all police officers returned to the “D main store,” and said, “I will die the victim who was out of the military room after being sealed,” and throw away.

2. At around 03:52 on the same day as Paragraph 1 of this Article, the Defendant assaulted the victim F (nive, 22 years of age) who reported 112 to the police, as described in Paragraph 1, at the street near the above D's store, who was in the view of “cirls, dead, and discarded,” with the victim’s her her her her her her her her sens.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning E and F;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Case summary agreement meetings, assistants, and application of court rulings and statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment (including the fact that there is a past record of the same kind of crime, and the fact that no statement has been received from victims) concerning the crime;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The extent of violence and intimidation under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the degree of intimidation, the violation of it, and the prohibition of recidivism, are more severe than imprisonment without prison labor prior to each of the crimes in this case.