1. The attached list is based on the executory exemplification of the payment order issued by the Busan District Court 2006 tea35522 against C.

According to the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7 and the whole pleadings, it is recognized that the defendant executed a compulsory execution against movables listed in the separate sheet Nos. 4 and 1516 on December 30, 2014 based on the original copy of the order of payment as stated in Paragraph (1) of the Disposition No. 1 for C, and each movable property listed in the separate sheet is purchased from the owner of the building on June 21, 201, or purchased from the owner of the building on June 21, 201, or purchased from the plaintiff on the Internet or electronic equipment from August 201 to September 201 of the same year.

Since each movable mentioned in the separate sheet is owned by the plaintiff, compulsory execution against the above movable property by the defendant based on the original copy of the payment order against C is not allowed.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.