logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.05.19 2016가단19571
물품대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

On the other hand, the defendant claimed that "C" was not paid the sales proceeds of raw ship equivalent to KRW 27,476,710 from the defendant who runs the retail business with the trade name of "C," while the defendant claimed that "C" was a retail business operated by "C," and the party who purchased the raw ship is not the defendant, but the party who purchased the raw ship as a retail business operated by "C."

Although the trade name of the retail company traded by the Plaintiff is identical to the name of the Defendant, it is the trade name that the Defendant’s mother has used in the same market prior to his pre-sale, and it appears that the Defendant’s testimony of the evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including the serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and witness D, and that the entire purport of the pleadings is visible, it is difficult to view the Defendant’s testimony by the evidence and witness E submitted by the Plaintiff as the Plaintiff as the Plaintiff

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

arrow