1. All appeals filed by the Defendants and the Prosecutor are dismissed.

2. Defendants are jointly and severally liable for compensation to AS.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The lower court’s judgment is erroneous as follows. ① As to the part of the victim W, the name of “W” was discovered from the list of computers and USB located in the Defendant’s office, and so long as it is evident that W was obtained by telephone loan fraud, this part of the crime shall be deemed to have been committed by the Defendants. ② With respect to the victim JB, JE, and JX portion: the victim JB, around May 8, 2012, the victim JB was not unfairly transferred KRW 240,00 to the account in the name of the Defendant, the victim JB, the victim JB, and the victim JJ on May 16, 2012. In light of the fact that the victim JB’s imprisonment, the victim JJ, and the victim JJ’s account in the name of the Defendant B and the Defendant JJ on the 1350,000 won, and that the victim JJJ was not found to have been duly established by the Defendant JJ and the Defendant JJ on the said part.

B. Each sentence sentenced by the court below to the Defendants is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The summary of this part of the facts charged in this part of the Prosecutor’s 1’s misunderstanding of the facts charged is the trade name “AD” centered on the General Book AC, Daegu-gu AE, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, AG, Daegu-gu, AH, Daegu-gu.