The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case, the defendant's security guards, etc. immediately after the defendant's fire prevention, rapidly extinguishing the security guards, etc., and that the defendant did not have any record of punishment for the same kind of crime.

However, each of the crimes of this case is a normal situation that the defendant applied for disability benefits to the Labor Welfare Corporation. However, although the defendant applied for disability benefits, he did not receive the notification of the non-payment of benefits, he saw the gasoline purchased in advance to the chemical group of the National Pension Service, and destroyed the optical cable owned by the company, such as LG Plus, which was installed on the floor of the chemical group, and the nature and method of the crime is very poor. The property damage caused by each of the crimes of this case is very large to KRW 170,000,000, and if the security guards did not promptly extinguish due to early fire prevention, there was a risk of spreading into large fire, and the defendant did not make any effort to recover damage.

위와 같은 사정들과 그 밖에 피고인의 나이, 성 행, 환경, 범행의 동기, 수단과 결과, 범행 후의 정황 등 변론에 나타난 모든 양형조건과 대법원 양형 위원회 제정 양형기준의 권고 형량 범위( 징역 1년 6월 이상) ◈ 법률상 처단형의 범위 : 징역 1년 6월 ~ 15년 ◈ 양형기준의 적용 일반 물건 방화죄 [ 유형의 결정] 방화범죄 > 일반적 기준 > 제 3 유형( 일반 물건 방화) [ 권고 영역 및 권고 형의 범위] 기본영역, 징역 10월 ~ 2 년 공용 건조물 방화 미수죄 양형기준이 설정되어 있지 않 음 다수범죄 처리기준의 적용 징역 1년 6월 이상( 양형기준이 설정된 일반 물건 방화죄와 양형기준이...