1. The Defendant’s KRW 20,336,984 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from November 8, 2014 to July 7, 2015, and the following.

1. According to Gap evidence Nos. 3 and evidence Nos. 4-1 through 5 of the judgment on the cause of the claim, Eul's business registration was completed with Eul's trade name as the representative of "C" until March 2014, and the plaintiff and D leased part of a factory within the location of the defendant's main office and supplied the vessel parts processing. The plaintiff completed business registration as the representative of "E" on April 2014 and succeeded to the previous rights and obligations that B traded between the defendant company and "C" with the trade name "C," and the plaintiff supplied the vessel parts processing of KRW 108,723,846 from the defendant during the period from March 2014 to July 2014 (13, 67, 176, 208, 2014, 3,86, 208, 2014, 206, 368, 2014, 206, 368, 2764, 276

Therefore, barring special circumstances, the Defendant recognized the Plaintiff as having been paid KRW 8,386,862 [1.4,90,000 (D’s cumulative or F’s account) on May 3, 2014; 2.3,100,00 won (F’s account) on May 11, 2014; 3,30,129,58 (B’s account) on May 27, 2014; 4,68,67,70,70,740 (Plaintiff’s account) on June 5, 2014; 5,00,00,000 won (Plaintiff’s account); 5,00,750,700 won (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s account”) on June 30, 2014; 630,70,710,740,700 won (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s account”) on June 30, 2014

2. On May 27, 2014, the Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff’s claim is unjustifiable, since most of the processing costs are paid to the Plaintiff, such as paying KRW 23,129,58 to the Plaintiff.

However, in this case, the Plaintiff sought to pay the remainder of the processing cost, excluding the above money claimed by the Defendant to the Plaintiff.