A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On November 12, 2013, the Defendant sentenced the Changwon District Court to four months of imprisonment for fraud, etc., and completed the execution of the said sentence on March 11, 2014.

1. Around May 6, 2014, the Defendant introduced the victim himself/herself as a management director of the E-stock company from Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Sungwon-si as the victim of the crime against the victim B, with the intent to acquire money by deceiving the victim by deceiving him/her because he/she has a relationship with the person in charge of personnel management of the E-stock company.

On July 1, 2014, the Defendant made a phone call to the victim at an irregular place and made the victim find employment with a person in charge of the personnel management of the company and a baby to drink. The Defendant made a false statement to “the cost of personnel solicitation”.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have a pro rata’s personnel management ties, so even if receiving money from the victim, the Defendant did not have the intent and ability to allow the victim to find employment.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 2 million won from the victim to the account of community credit cooperatives (F) in the name of the Defendant on July 1, 2014, and received 8.5 million won over six times in total from around that time to October 21, 2014, as shown in attached Table 1.

2. Around August 7, 2014, the Defendant introduced the victim G, who was introduced from the above B, as a management director of the E Stock Company, to obtain money by deceiving the victim G with the statement that he/she is friendly with a person in charge of personnel management of scroc and SK Energy, so that he/she can find employment for the children of the victim.

On August 9, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim that “The Defendant may recommend employment of the children who will support the personnel in charge of the personnel in charge of the SK Energy’s flight ticket costs.”

However, the defendant did not have a sonship with SK Energy, so even if he received money from the victim, he is able to find employment.