A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 23, 2015, at around 00:57, the Defendant: (a) 10 minutes of 10 minutes of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits of bits, and

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of public duties by police officers on the maintenance of public peace and order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (F telephone investigation of witnesses and G telephone investigation of witnesses);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of recommendations on the sentencing criteria [the scope of recommendations] shall be the basic area (two months of imprisonment or one year or four months of imprisonment) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the scope of recommendations].

2. The sentence shall be determined like the order, taking into consideration the fact that the defendant who has been sentenced to the punishment is in depth and reflects his criminal act, the fact that there is no record of punishment other than the one time fine, and other various sentencing conditions shown in the pleadings of this case, such as the age, character and conduct and environment of the defendant;