logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2014.11.07 2014고합140
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(준강간등)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for a maximum of four years, for a short of three years, for a short of three years, for each of three years, for Defendant P and Q, and for two years, for Defendant R.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 2, 2014, Defendant A’s violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (rape-rape, etc.) committed one-time sexual intercourse with the victim’s will and panty in the same room as the victim after drinking alcohol together with her friendship at the house of Cheongdong-gu Cheongdong-gu W apartment X (the 16-year-old age-) on the same day. Defendant A had sexual intercourse with the victim at around 06:30 on the following day.

As a result, the defendant has sexual intercourse with the victim by taking advantage of the victim's failure to resist.

2. 피고인들의 성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(특수준강간) 피고인 A은 2014. 3. 3. 07:00경 위 피해자의 집에서 나와 청주시 흥덕구 Y에 있는 ‘Z’노래방 앞 노상에서 피고인 P, Q, R을 만나 그들에게 “여자 두 명과 술을 먹고 두 명을 다 따먹었다. 한 명은 얼굴과 몸매가 쌔끈하다. 형들도 하실래요”라고 권유를 하며 위 피해자의 집에 안내하기로 하고, 피고인 Q, P, R은 가위ㆍ바위ㆍ보를 하여 순서대로 피해자들을 간음하기로 공모하였다.

On March 3, 2014, at around 07:30, the Defendants opened a string door and opened a string door, which was not locked after arrival at the above victim’s house, and the Defendants: (a) reported the network; (b) Defendant P was out of the victim X’s panty and panty; (c) Defendant Q was in sexual intercourse once with the victim; (d) Defendant Q was out of the victim AA (n, 14 years old); and (c) Defendant Q was out of the body of the female, and was in sexual intercourse with the female, but the victim did not come out of the wind that the strings would come up with his hand, but did not come out of the end.

As a result, the Defendants jointly committed sexual intercourse with the victim X by taking advantage of the state of the victims' failure to resist, and attempted to have sexual intercourse with the victim A, but failed to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements 1.1.

arrow