logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.07.13 2016노2350
강제추행
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant was not guilty of the victim's chest, and even if he had contacted the defendant's grandchildren and the victim's chest, he had contacted.

Even if the defendant is unable to memory, there is no intention of indecent act by force.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below that found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case on a different premise is erroneous and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

The sentencing of the court below's unfair sentencing (the imprisonment of six months, the suspension of execution of two years, and the order to attend a sexual assault treatment lecture for forty hours) is too unreasonable.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below as to the assertion of misunderstanding of the facts as to the grounds for appeal, namely, the victim's statement in the court of original instance and the investigative agency at the time of the instant crime, are consistent and specific as to the victim's speech and behavior, the content of damage, the fear and response of the victim, the situation before and after the crime, the witness F's statement is inconsistent with the witness F's statement in the court of original instance, and the victim did not make any objection against the defendant's her chest in the room. However, the court of original instance cited the idea that "other than the defendant's studio, it was more than two, and it was possible for the victim to take the action against the defendant, as well as his her her son at the court of original instance."

The studio stated to the effect that "I tried to resist by entering the studio in front of the studio," and that I explained to the effect that "I would like to resist by the studio," and that at the time, I had an explanation to the investigative agency, "the injured party from the studio-out, scambling, and desire for customers in the studio."

말하며 문을 열어 달라고 해서 문을 열어 주었더니 룸으로 들어가 테이블을 발로 찼다’ 는 취지로 진술하여 피해 자의 위 진술과 부합하는 점,...

arrow