logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 공주지원 2015.02.27 2013고단160
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2013 Highest 160"

1. The Defendant, as a ship of Chinese nationality, conspired to acquire money from a Chinese-satis female who is a Chinese-satisfy female (hereinafter “D”) with the Chinese-satisfy Chinese-satisfy Chinese-satisfy Chinese-satisfy Chinese-satisfy female in writing.

At around 11:00 on March 8, 2013, the Defendant: (a) 11:00, the victim E sent D at any coffee shop in Jinjin-si, and (b) D considered the victim, and (c) said Korean people were satisfing a fake oil to the Korean people on the name of the fluor, who conspired to sell a fake oil in advance; and (d) said Korean people considered the fake oil to be “Aush good”; and (e) said that the 1g foot oil was sold at KRW 130,00,000.

D) D returned to a coffee shop and selling 500g of fake oil from the Defendant to the above Korean people, while making a false statement to the effect that “I would like to sell this article to the said Korean people, I would like to lend money to the Defendant in which the value of the article to be left to the Defendant, and if there is no money to be left to the Defendant, I would also lend it to the her friend. I would sell this open oil to the said Korean people and return money 30 minutes after borrowing it to the friend.” The Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “this open oil will be sold to the said Korean people and borrowed money after 30 minutes.”

However, in fact, the above open oil was not a bad thing, and the defendant and the above Chinese investor borrowed money from the victim, and had the victim sell goods to the above Korean people, and there was no intention or ability to repay the money even if they borrowed money from the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 3.7 million won in cash from the victim for the purpose of borrowing money.

Accordingly, the defendant is a Korean person D, nameless Korean person.

arrow