logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.05.01 2014고단756
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (AD) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.A.) are those who are engaged in driving a BAcar car.

On December 17, 2013, the Defendant driven the above car on 17:00 on December 17, 2013, and proceeded with the road front of the International School of Yeonsu-gu, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, through the Art Center 97 Doz. 45 (Songdo-dong) from the private apartment distance to the 3rd intersection.

Since there is a long distance intersection where signal lights are installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive in accordance with the signals by reducing speed and by properly examining the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while proceeding without disregarding the change of the vehicle progress signal from the front side to the stop signal, was led by the victim C (the age of 42) who entered the said intersection in accordance with the going signal from the 1st apartment of the apartment complex to the X-ray apartment complex of 10-year-old apartment complex, as well as the front part of the motor vehicle operated by the victim C (the age of 42) as the left part of the said motor vehicle.

The Defendant, by negligence in the course of performing the above duties, sustained injury to salt and tension that requires treatment for about two weeks by the victim, and at the same time, even though the flaging vehicle was damaged to the sum of 11,461,446 won, such as replacement of the previous flag, and did not immediately stop the flag and escape without taking measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

2. The Defendant violating the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is a motor vehicle owner in the name of (E) the Defendant operated.

The Defendant operated the said car at the same time, place, and without mandatory insurance, at the same time and place as the preceding paragraph.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Photographs, such as traffic accident reports, on-site photographs, investigation reports, suspected vehicles, etc.;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the driver's license ledger, chassis, and mandatory insurance bureau;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow