(영문) 부산지방법원 서부지원 2018.12.18 2018고정465

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 부산지방법원 서부지원 2018.12.18 2018고정465

폭행

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the owner of the building in Busan-gu C and 3-story, and the victim D ( South and 60 years old) is the tenant of the third floor of the above housing.

On July 20, 2017, the Defendant, at around 11:30 on July 20, 2017, talked about the water rate between the victim and the victim at the living room on the Busan Seo-gu C and the second floor of the house, and shown that the agreement was wrong and changed to locked. However, the Defendant used again to return it, which led the victim to take over the victim’s left hand and knife the victim’s left hand and knife the victim’s upper part with his left hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. The following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, such as a copy of the real estate lease contract 2 copy, diagnosis document, and medical expenses payment confirmation document (the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that there was no assault by the defendant, such as the defendant's scambling or taking over the victim's scambling, etc.). In other words, the victim's scambling and scambling the victim's scambling in an investigative agency and this court, in order for the defendant to take the scambling of the scambling contract at the time, the victim's scambling and scambling the victim's scambling toward the toilet, and there is no circumstance to suspect the credibility of the victim's statement in the present situation, and the defendant also was beyond the living room in the prosecution.

In full view of the fact that the victim was over the floor of the ward at the time, the defendant could sufficiently recognize the fact that the defendant had the victim go beyond the victim by fasting the victim's sloping, booming the victim's sloping, etc., so the above argument by the defendant and the victim is without merit.

Application of Statutes

1. Criminal facts;

유사 판례

-서울북부지방법원 2018.01.19 2017고합447

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.08.22 2014노1205

-의정부지방법원 2016.06.21 2016고합148

-대구지방법원 2017.06.23 2017고합94

-부산지방법원 2014.03.17 2013고정6330