The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of 10 months sentenced by the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is based on the following facts: (a) although the defendant is deemed to have served in the investigative process to reflect his mistake in depth; and (b) the defendant cooperates in the investigation process to arrest his accomplices, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case even though he had been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor over several occasions; (c) the defendant assisted another person in the purchase and medication of the Mespia; and (d) other factors of sentencing stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, character, character, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (d) other factors of sentencing as provided in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.