Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

B was a person who resided in the Gu-gun C land and operates the Party D's neighboring wife, and the Defendant was a neighboring E/F landowner of the above land, and the Defendant and B were in a state that they were not adequate for appraisal due to the use of valley grain in the above F land from October 2018.

B The land of G, E, H land, and F land can be used as the land of the above C, and not only the above land B, but also the length of the village people and the new roads visiting the above land.

1. On November 12, 2018, at around 13:40 on November 13:40, the Defendant obstructed the traffic of the road by cutting down posts at the end of one side and connecting telegraphs installed at the end of the other end of the hacket and the hacket to the hacker line, on the other end of the hacket and the hacket.

2. On March 5, 2019, at around 10:00, the Defendant installed a decline at an intermediate point of the land (explosive approximately 3.54m) along the entrance of the land where he adjoins the land E and G land, and obstructed the traffic of approximately 1.42m of the total land along the road by blocking approximately 1.42m of the width of the road.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police interrogation protocol concerning B (Evidence No. 55, 116 No. 55);

1. Each police statement made to I and J;

1. A report on the occurrence (general traffic obstruction) and on-site photographs;

1. Investigation report (No. 109 of the evidence list);

1. The Defendant asserts that, on the ground of internal death (on the field rent), he did not interfere with land transport even though he laid down a down line.

However, the circumstances acknowledged by evidence, i.e., at the time of the defendant's decline, the way of this case had been a concrete package to the extent that the motor vehicle can move, the way of this case was used by others as well as B, and the passageers due to the act such as the defendant's criminal facts.