beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On November 25, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of two million won for a violation of road traffic law in the Gwangju District Court's net support on November 25, 2008, and a person who had been sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for six months by the same court on August 13, 2010.
On April 24, 2018, at around 07:40, the Defendant driven a B-wing and Ⅲ truck under the influence of alcohol content at approximately 0.171% from a section of approximately 1 kilometer to the roads in the direction of the river basin located in the same city, in the direction of the river basin in the same city, from the inn city, in the direction of the river basin in the same city.
As a result, the defendant was punished not less than twice due to drinking, and was driving again.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;
1. References to inquiries, such as criminal history, and the application of the judgment text;
1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;
1. The fact that there are many criminal records of the same kind of sentencing as the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, the blood alcohol concentration is high, while the defendant drives in an abrue with the previous mathm without the multiple alcohol, there are some circumstances to be taken into account in the circumstances, radius, the fact that the same criminal records have been relatively old, the defendant's age, sexual behavior, family relationship, environment, background and result of the crime, and other circumstances shown in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered by comprehensively taking into account.