logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.06.19 2014고단3226
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동재물손괴등)등
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of 2,500,000 won, by a fine of 4,00,000 won, and by a fine of 1,50,000 won, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants, around 21:00 on May 10, 2014, 21: (a) on the grounds that the victim H in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government was drinking at the main point of “I” operated by the victim H while drinking alcoholic beverages and singing with other customers, Defendant B, while drinking, was incilated with other customers, was fluored with the other customers, and he was fluoring with the kidles, sound devices, and strawers installed at the stage while drinking the kidles, kids, and strawing back the kids in the display site, and kiding the drinking and drinking water in the form of drinking and drinking water, and Defendant A and Defendant C collected them in combination with this.

Accordingly, the defendants jointly damaged the victim's property in a way that the amount of approximately KRW 6,373,00 is equivalent to the repair cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s statement in the second trial record;

1. The statements made by witnesses H and J in the third protocol of trial;

1. Statement of the police statement to K;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 2(2) and (1)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 2(2) and (1)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, and Article 2(2) and (1)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Election Act, Article 2(2) and (1)1 of the Act, Article 2(1)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, and Article 366 of the Criminal Act,

1. Defendants of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The dismissed part of the prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) Defendant A, at around 21:00 on May 10, 2014, at the main point of “I” operated by the Victim H in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the ground that the victim H (67 years of age) was able to live in a bridge of the said victim; (b) he was able to walk back the victim’s face on two occasions with his hand and walk back the victim’s face on two occasions; and (c) the victim J (57 years of age).

arrow