The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the fact that there were two children in the summary of the grounds for appeal, but one of them was treated as a heart disease, and it was inevitable to prevent the instant crime from committing the instant crime in order to raise hospital expenses and living expenses, etc., the punishment (fine 2.5 million won) imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, considering the fact that the damage caused by insurance fraud, such as the instant crime, is ultimately borne by good policyholders, and thus, the nature of the crime is not good; the Defendant did not discharge the damage to insurance companies that are victims up to now; the Defendant did not reach an agreement with the victims; the Defendant has been sentenced three times to a fine in the past as a crime of fraud; and other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, such as the character, conduct and environment of the Defendant, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court cannot be deemed unfair. Therefore, the above argument by the Defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.